How Do You Know That Your Safety Training is Effective?
February 19, 2021
You are a safety manager for several facilities at a major company and you’ve just been tasked with improving employee safety in your facility. Injuries are too high and cost the company too much. There has been too much missed time and you’ve had to bring on and train a bunch of new employees so productivity is down.
In your research on the problem, you’ve used your worker’s comp numbers to determine that back injuries are the main culprit and you need to train workers on lifting safely. To do this, you spend time finding relevant training videos, putting together a tip sheet to hang on bulletin boards, and you schedule a training session for every shift at each facility. When done right, this prep work can take anywhere from 40 to 200 hours. The time comes and you have to spend time day and night training your staff for several days. You log who attended and then have to spend the next week following up with anyone who missed the training.
Team members seem to digest the safety training. They asked thoughtful questions and now are back out on the floor. But then how do you know that your message was effective or how much of the training team members retained? Current practice offers a few ways to measure efficacy depending on the amount of time that you are willing to put in.
Level 1: Reactions
Reactions surveying allows you to gauge how much employees liked the information provided and how much they think it will help. This information can be provided immediately following the training via surveys.
Pros: You know immediately whether or not employees may retain the training based on how they felt about it. If employees liked the training or felt that it provided important information, they are more likely to apply it.
Cons: Even if employees liked the training, you don’t know how well it transfers to the floor or how long it will last.
Level 2: Learning
You can test employees how well employees retained the information provided. Pre- and post-training evaluations can test if they know what to do in certain situations based on the information provided. This can also be given immediately following training and you can give periodic assessments to check if team members remember the information.
Pros: You can immediately find out how much information employees really remember. If employees don’t remember the information, they won’t be able to apply it. You can also periodically follow up to see if knowledge is retained and give additional training/reminders as needed.
Cons: You still don’t know to what degree the information is transferring to the floor. Team members may know what they need to do, but circumstances on the floor may prevent it from happening.
Level 3: Behavior
You can observe employees on the floor, and encourage others to do the same, to see if the recommendations of safety training are being followed. 3-4 months of observation are suggested to confirm findings.
Pros: Observing safe lifting behavior allows you to confirm that training has transferred to the actual workday.
Cons: Observation takes time from your work day that could otherwise be applied to different safety issues. This level of results measuring will require many individual hours and long time frames to return meaningful data.
Level 4: Results
The training needs to have had an effect on the bottom line. After all, that was one of the main reasons to conduct safety training in the first place. Measuring ROI is an important step ultimately determining if safety training has been effective. Are less people getting injured than before? Are worker’s compensation costs down? Is productivity up?
Pros: These results put real numbers against the problem. You can isolate around the safety training and ensure that the problems that instigated safety training have been solved.
Cons: ROI is extremely important, but is also slow to determine true results. Best practice is to measure multiple times over months to find out if there has been an effect. Also this model doesn’t not account for leading indicators which show how much at risk your workforce is at.
As you can see, there are two major options when it comes to measuring the results of safety training. The first is to immediately find out if employees understood the material giving you a tight feedback loop on which materials are sticking. However, the downside is you still don’t know to what degree the knowledge transfer to the floor. The second is to measure behavior change or other data over time via observation or injury/productivity numbers. This method demonstrates how well the training knowledge is retained and transferred to the floor but requires a tremendous amount of manhours and utilizes lagging indicators with reviewing the injury numbers.
VIT gives companies the ability to measure behavior change both immediately following safety training and over time in a cost effective manner. The ARC device tracks safe lifting behavior and reports data back as soon as the end of the very first shift. Reporting on a before/after snapshot shows the effectiveness of training or other initiatives as soon as a few days after training. Haptic feedback also ensures that your team members are aware of unsafe positions while on the floor. Schedule a demo meeting with us to get started for free.